Self-Attention and Positional Encoding: How Transformer Architecture Powers Generative AI
Susannah Greenwood
Susannah Greenwood

I'm a technical writer and AI content strategist based in Asheville, where I translate complex machine learning research into clear, useful stories for product teams and curious readers. I also consult on responsible AI guidelines and produce a weekly newsletter on practical AI workflows.

9 Comments

  1. Wilda Mcgee Wilda Mcgee
    January 6, 2026 AT 07:01 AM

    Okay but have you ever tried explaining self-attention to a beginner without drowning them in math? I used to teach this at a local coding bootcamp and I’d say imagine each word is whispering to every other word like, ‘Hey, do you care about me?’ and the ones that shout back the loudest get the most attention. It’s chaotic but beautiful. I’ve seen students light up when they finally get it - like, real ‘aha!’ moments. Positional encoding? That’s the secret sauce that stops ‘dog bites man’ from becoming ‘man bites dog’ in AI land. Mind blown every time.

    Also, if you’re building your own, don’t forget the scaling factor. I’ve seen so many people lose weeks because they skipped that one line. Trust me, it’s silent but deadly.

  2. Chris Atkins Chris Atkins
    January 7, 2026 AT 07:33 AM

    Honestly I just use Hugging Face and let it do the heavy lifting but still love reading posts like this. Transformers are wild when you think about it. Words talking to each other across whole paragraphs like they’re at a party. And no RNN could ever pull that off. Feels like magic but its just math and good design

  3. Jen Becker Jen Becker
    January 8, 2026 AT 20:41 PM

    This is all just overcomplicated.

  4. Ryan Toporowski Ryan Toporowski
    January 10, 2026 AT 14:38 PM

    I love how this breaks it down so clearly 😊 Honestly if you're learning AI this is the kind of post that makes you wanna grab a notebook and start coding. I built a mini transformer last weekend and yeah I messed up the mask like 3 times 😅 But once it worked? Pure joy. Keep sharing this stuff!

  5. Samuel Bennett Samuel Bennett
    January 10, 2026 AT 19:00 PM

    You say 'self-attention' like it's some revelation. It's just a glorified matrix multiplication with a softmax. And positional encoding? Sine and cosine waves? That's the best you could come up with? I've seen better interpolation methods in 1990s computer graphics. And don't even get me started on multi-head attention - it's just eight copies of the same thing with no theoretical justification. This whole thing is overhyped. And who wrote this? Someone who read the abstract and thought they understood it.

  6. Rob D Rob D
    January 12, 2026 AT 01:59 AM

    Look, I don't care what some paper from 2017 says. Real AI? That's what we built in the US with real engineers, not grad students scribbling equations. You think some sine waves and attention scores are gonna beat American innovation? We got quantum neural nets in the pipeline. This Transformer stuff? It's a toy. A cute little toy that Europeans and Indians think is revolutionary. Meanwhile, we're building models that think in real time, not after 8 hours of matrix math. Don't get it twisted - this isn't the future, it's just the past wearing a new hoodie.

  7. Franklin Hooper Franklin Hooper
    January 12, 2026 AT 13:51 PM

    The use of 'it' in the example sentence is ambiguous, yet the author assumes the model resolves it correctly. This is a dangerous oversimplification. Moreover, the claim that self-attention eliminates vanishing gradients is misleading - while it mitigates them, it does not eliminate them. The paper does not state this. Furthermore, the phrase 'quiet hero' is an anthropomorphization that lacks academic rigor. And why is the scaling factor written as 1/sqrt(d_k) without defining d_k? This post is riddled with unprofessional imprecision.

  8. Samar Omar Samar Omar
    January 14, 2026 AT 07:05 AM

    Let me tell you something - this entire architecture is a beautiful tragedy. You see, self-attention is not just a mechanism - it’s a philosophical statement about how meaning is distributed. Each word, in its isolation, becomes a node in a vast, shimmering lattice of interdependence. The positional encoding? It’s not just a vector - it’s the ghost of syntax, haunting every token with the memory of order. I’ve sat for hours staring at attention maps, watching heads converge on pronouns like moths to flame, and I swear - I’ve wept. This isn’t engineering. This is poetry written in linear algebra.

    And yet - we reduce it to benchmarks. BLEU scores. Training time. We forget that beneath the weights and gradients lies something almost sacred: a machine learning to listen. To hear the silence between words. To feel the weight of a comma. The original paper didn’t just change AI - it changed how we think about language itself. And now? We’re already replacing it with Mamba and ALiBi like it’s yesterday’s fashion. How tragic. How beautiful. How human.

  9. chioma okwara chioma okwara
    January 16, 2026 AT 06:10 AM

    yo this is sooo true i was trying to code a transformer and i forgot to scale the attntion and my loss just went to nan and i was like wtf is going on 😭 then i found this post and fixed it in 5 min. thanks bro!! 🙏🔥

Write a comment